More Bang for the Health Care Buck

Released by: CALPIRG Education Fund

Executive Summary

The high cost of health care in California imposes an increasing burden on households, businesses, government, and the state’s economy – a burden made heavier by the current economic crisis.  The money that insurance companies spend on inefficient administration, billing and marketing – instead of medical care for their enrollees – contributes to the high health care costs Californians must endure.  To incentive efficiency and get costs under control, California should require health plans and insurers to spend at least 85 percent of revenue on health care.  The majority of California health plans, including small, large, non-profit and for-profit HMOs, already meet this efficiency standard, as well as a large percentage of health plans and insurers across the country. 

Health care is enormously expensive in California.  But a lot of the money Californians spend on health insurance goes toward things that have nothing to do with keeping us healthy, such as inefficient administration and billing practices, marketing, and profits.

·    In 2004, insurance companies, the state and federal government, individuals and other payers spent $167 billion on health care in California, equal to 11 percent of the state’s gross domestic product.

·    For 36 California HMO plans evaluated by the California Medical Association, administrative spending ranged from 4.1 percent of revenue to 16.3 percent.

·    Health plans and insurers have an incentive to keep the percentage of revenue they spend on health care low.  For example, Great-West Healthcare of California decreased the percentage of revenue it spent on medical costs every year from 2003 to 2007, from 85.8 percent to 69.1 percent. Over the same period of time the company’s profits increased from 0.5 percent to over 10 percent, while the portion spent on administration stayed essentially the same.

Health plans and insurance companies have an incentive to reduce the amount they spend on health care because the stock market favors companies that devote higher portions of their revenue to administration, marketing, and profit-taking.

To get rising health care costs under control, it is critical to encourage greater insurer efficiency and increase the value of coverage by requiring insurers to spend 85 cents of every revenue dollar on health care. Providing incentives for efficiency will reward insurers for finding ways to reduce administrative costs and deliver better value to consumers.  Further, data on current practices of California insurers shows that an 85 percent standard is both strong and achievable.

Successful health plans and insurers can, and often do, spend more than 85 percent of revenue on health care.

·    While some California health insurers spend too small a share of revenue on health care, many major HMOs achieve a proper balance. More than two-thirds of the major HMOs in California spend at least 85 percent of their revenues on health care.

Nationally, many health insurers – including some of the nation’s largest and most respected health plans, such as Aetna’s plans in Washington and Michigan, and Anthem’s plan in New York – spend the bulk of revenue on health care. Nearly half of 53 health plans surveyed nationwide spend at least 85 percent of their revenues on health care.

Requiring health insurance companies to spend at least 85 percent of their revenue on medical care would ensure that our health care dollars are being spent on health care and could save Californians’ money.

·    Enforcing a minimum percentage of health care spending encourages insurance companies to increase their administrative efficiency.

·    In 2007, the absence of an 85 percent floor allowed California health insurance companies to spend $1.1 billion on administration and profits instead of health care.

California should require health plans and insurance companies to spend at least 85 percent of revenue dollars on health care, to encourage efficiency and ensure that the companies are spending health care money on Californians’ health.  Furthermore, additional steps should also be taken to help insurance companies increase their efficiency, bring down costs, and ensure that money spent in the health care industry goes to improving Californians’ health.


Support us

Your tax-deductible donation supports CALPIRG Education Fund’s work to educate consumers on the issues that matter, and the powerful interests that are blocking progress.

Learn More

You can also support CALPIRG Education Fund’s work through bequests, contributions from life insurance or retirement plans, securities contributions and vehicle donations. 

CALPIRG Education Fund is part of The Public Interest Network, which operates and supports organizations committed to a shared vision of a better world and a strategic approach to social change.